ROLE OF EUROPEAN MOBILITY AND ITS IMPACTS IN NARRATIVES, DEBATES AND EU REFORMS

The fiscal effects of EU migration

The fiscal effects of EU migration

March 22, 2018

Working Paper

This working paper from work package 4 is the first large cross-country estimation of the fiscal effects of migration of EU citizens within the EEA (European Economic Area).

The vast majority of EEA countries – 21 out of 29 – saw positive net fiscal impacts during 2004-2015, receiving more in taxes and other contributions from EU migrants than they then spent in services (such as education, healthcare, infrastructure costs, welfare benefits and other costs) that were provided to EU migrants. In almost all countries – whether the net fiscal impact was positive or negative – it represented a relatively small fraction of GDP – less than +/-0.4% in 24 out of 29 cases.

Switzerland, Cyprus, Norway and Belgium experienced the greatest net fiscal benefits, while Slovakia, Poland and Estonia experienced the greatest net fiscal cost of EU immigration. In all, more than two thirds of EEA countries saw net fiscal gains from EU immigration.

 

IN THE NEWS

Here is a snapshot of news articles about this working paper:

REUTERS

The Baltic Times

EuroNews

London South East 

Croatia’s 24Sata

 

Latest Tweets

Have a look at the computer-assisted migration coverage analysis by @EU_REMINDER focusing on #migration discourses in European media
#MigrationEU #Research https://t.co/MHUuYvNC1Q

In case somebody out there ever needs comparative content analyses on migration coverage, this is it #EU_REMINDER @CompCommLab https://t.co/UQDi000hB8

🚨 Migration Report 🚨 We analyzed migration coverage in up to 7 EU countries betw. 2003 & 2017. We looked at visibility of the topic, sentiment and framing. We also compared migration (generally) to Intra-EU mobility (in particular). All using computational methods. (Thread!) https://t.co/PxiBqRt10q

Signup to our newsletter

Enter your email address to get the latest news direct to your inbox